New research: The State of SaaS: Build vs. Buy, October 2026.The State of SaaS, October 2026. Read the report
Build part of it. Self-hosted Git is mature and cheap to run; keep renting where your open source community or audit needs live.
Editor's view until 10 teams answer
Keep paying
Median of 2 companies · teams pay $47,184 a year (HissingKitty, 1 team, 1 company)
Compare all 2Switch
Made one? List it free
Be the first tool listedBuild your own
Build code hosting tools? Add your price
Be the first builder listedEvery number shows how many teams it comes from. Run your own numbers
Published prices from each company's own pricing page · 2 incumbents · 0 AI-native tools
Starting plan to top plan where both are published. Flat account prices, free plans and custom quotes are left out. What teams actually pay a year is shown separately below.
Median yearly price by company
What teams pay, shared anonymously. Count beside each company.
Yearly savings, as each team reported it
No savings reported yet. Build these for clients? Be the first builder listed.
List your companyReasons named in 0 reviews, posts and answers
No reasons shared yet. Left one of these? Say why in a review.
Write a reviewReady-made tools, ranked by visitor votes.
No AI-native tools listed yet. Be the first.
List your toolTeams that build a custom code hosting tool you own, ranked by votes.
No builders listed yet. Be the first.
List your companyEvery company in code hosting tools, with what teams pay and how many alternatives are listed. Ranked by how much teams have shared. Methodology
Building your own Git Server makes sense when you use a small part of a big tool and pay for the rest. The build time and costs above come only from teams that reported a build. Check your own case before you decide.
Nothing here yet. Reviews and listings show up the moment they're approved.
Write a reviewEditor's view. Plan who will handle maintenance before replacing a tool.
Answered from the data on this page. Answers update as teams share more.
1 team shared what they pay for code hosting tools. The median is $47,184 a year. By company: GitHub $47,184 (1 team).
None are listed yet. Teams that made one can list it for free, and visitors vote the best to the top.
Yes, but no custom build companies are listed for code hosting tools yet. Ask any builder who will support and update it after launch.
No team has reported a build time for a custom code hosting tool yet. A first version usually covers self-hosted git server, code review and merge rules and build and deploy pipelines.
No approved reviews yet. Reviews come from teams paying for the software today.
Self-hosted Git is mature and cheap to run; keep renting where your open source community or audit needs live.
Your open source community lives on one platform. You need audit-ready access controls on day one. No one on your team can run servers.
Anonymous pricing, approved reviews, public posts and listings from the teams and builders themselves. Every number shows how many it comes from, and nothing is estimated. See the methodology page for details.
Thirty seconds, anonymous. Every rating and price helps the next buyer decide whether to keep paying.